Appearance
ASM3 - Activated Sludge Model No. 3
Storage-based metabolism model
Overview
ASM3 represents a conceptual improvement over ASM1 by explicitly modeling internal storage of substrates. It provides a more accurate representation of actual biomass metabolism, particularly for systems with varying loads.
When to Use
Recommended For
- High-rate activated sludge
- Systems with variable loading
- SBR processes
- Research applications
Compared to ASM1
| Aspect | ASM1 | ASM3 |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | Implicit | Explicit |
| Decay concept | Death-regeneration | Endogenous respiration |
| Complexity | Lower | Higher |
| Dynamic accuracy | Good | Better |
State Variables
ASM3 uses 12 state variables:
Soluble Components
| Symbol | Description | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| S_O2 | Dissolved oxygen | mg O2/L |
| S_S | Readily biodegradable | mg COD/L |
| S_NH4 | Ammonia nitrogen | mg N/L |
| S_N2 | Dinitrogen | mg N/L |
| S_NOX | Nitrate + nitrite | mg N/L |
| S_ALK | Alkalinity | mmol/L |
| S_I | Soluble inert | mg COD/L |
Particulate Components
| Symbol | Description | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| X_S | Slowly biodegradable | mg COD/L |
| X_I | Particulate inert | mg COD/L |
| X_H | Heterotrophic biomass | mg COD/L |
| X_STO | Stored substrate | mg COD/L |
| X_A | Autotrophic biomass | mg COD/L |
Key Concepts
Storage Mechanism
Two-step substrate utilization:
Step 1: Storage
S_S → X_STO (fast, high rate)
Step 2: Growth
X_STO → X_H (slower, growth limited)Advantages
- Better dynamic response - Captures feast-famine behavior
- Realistic decay - Direct endogenous respiration
- Improved oxygen uptake - Two distinct phases
Storage Rate
$$r_{STO} = k_{STO} \cdot \frac{S_S}{K_S + S_S} \cdot \frac{S_{O2}}{K_{O2} + S_{O2}} \cdot X_H$$
Growth from Storage
$$r_{growth} = \mu_H \cdot \frac{X_{STO}/X_H}{K_{STO} + X_{STO}/X_H} \cdot \frac{S_{O2}}{K_{O2} + S_{O2}} \cdot X_H$$
Parameters
Storage Parameters
| Parameter | Symbol | Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Storage rate | kSTO | 5.0 | 1/d |
| Storage yield | YSTO | 0.85 | g/g |
| Max growth rate | μH | 2.0 | 1/d |
| Storage half-sat | KSTO | 1.0 | g/g |
Comparison with ASM1
| Parameter | ASM1 | ASM3 |
|---|---|---|
| μmax,H | 6.0 | 2.0 |
| YH | 0.67 | 0.63 |
| bH | 0.62 | 0.20 |
Note: Lower μmax in ASM3 because growth is from storage.
Oxygen Uptake
OUR Components
- Storage OUR - Substrate → Storage
- Growth OUR - Storage → Biomass
- Endogenous OUR - Biomass decay
$$OUR_{total} = OUR_{storage} + OUR_{growth} + OUR_{decay}$$
Dynamic OUR Profile
Substrate added
↓
OUR ─────┐
│ High OUR (storage phase)
│───────────────┐
│ │ Lower OUR (growth phase)
│ └──────────────────
│ Endogenous OUR
Time ────┴─────────────────────────────────→Configuration in ErgoPlanner
Enabling ASM3
- Select biological reactor
- Set Calculation Mode to Advanced
- Select Biokinetic Model: ASM3
- Configure storage parameters
When to Choose ASM3
- Variable loading conditions
- SBR with distinct phases
- High-rate systems
- Research/calibration needs
Processes
Heterotrophic Processes (7)
- Aerobic storage of S_S
- Anoxic storage of S_S
- Aerobic growth on X_STO
- Anoxic growth on X_STO
- Aerobic endogenous respiration
- Anoxic endogenous respiration
- Aerobic respiration of X_STO
Autotrophic Processes (3)
- Aerobic growth of nitrifiers
- Aerobic endogenous respiration
- Anoxic endogenous respiration
Hydrolysis (2)
- Aerobic hydrolysis
- Anoxic hydrolysis
Example: SBR Process
Cycle Phases
| Phase | Duration | Process |
|---|---|---|
| Fill | 1 h | Substrate addition |
| React | 4 h | Aeration, storage, growth |
| Settle | 1 h | Clarification |
| Decant | 0.5 h | Effluent withdrawal |
| Idle | 0.5 h | Sludge waste |
ASM3 Behavior
Fill Phase:
- Rapid substrate storage
- High OUR
React Phase:
- Growth from stored substrate
- Moderate OUR
- Nitrification
Settle/Decant:
- Endogenous respiration only
- Low OUR
Calibration Tips
Key Parameters
- kSTO - Storage rate (from batch tests)
- YSTO - Storage yield
- μH - Growth rate from storage
- KSTO - Storage half-saturation
Calibration Procedure
- Batch tests for storage kinetics
- Respirometry for OUR components
- Continuous data for growth parameters
- Dynamic validation
Limitations
- No biological P removal - Add PAO model
- Single storage compound - Simplified
- More parameters - Harder to calibrate
- Similar steady-state - Differences mainly dynamic
Comparison: ASM1 vs ASM3
| Criterion | ASM1 | ASM3 |
|---|---|---|
| Simplicity | ★★★★ | ★★★ |
| Dynamic accuracy | ★★★ | ★★★★ |
| Data availability | ★★★★★ | ★★★ |
| Research use | ★★★★ | ★★★★ |
| Design practice | ★★★★★ | ★★★ |
Related Models
References
- Gujer, W. et al. "ASM3" Water Science & Technology, 1999
- Koch, G. et al. "Storage in ASM3" Water Research, 2000
- Henze, M. "Activated Sludge Models" IWA Publishing