Appearance
Humus Tanks - PS221 Design Standards
Humus tanks (also called secondary settling tanks or final clarifiers in biofilter systems) capture sloughed biomass from biofilters. They provide final clarification before discharge or further treatment.
UK PS221 Standards
Design Criteria
| Parameter | PS221 Limit | Units | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLR (all tanks in service) | ≤ 1.0 | m³/m²/h | Hydraulic loading rate at FFT |
| HLR (N-1, one tank out) | ≤ 2.0 | m³/m²/h | With one tank OOS for maintenance |
| Minimum HRT | ≥ 2.0 | hours | At maximum flow (FFT) |
| Minimum SWD | ≥ 2.0 | m | Sidewater depth |
| Minimum tanks | 2 | - | For N-1 redundancy |
Comparison with Primary Tanks (PS208)
| Parameter | Primary (PS208) | Humus (PS221) | Reason for Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max HLR | 1.2 m/h (DWF) | 1.0 m/h (FFT) | Humus sludge settles slower than primary |
| Min HRT | 2 hours | 2 hours | Same settling time requirement |
| Min SWD | 2.5 m | 2.0 m | Humus tanks can be shallower |
| Sludge %DS | 3-5% | 1-2% | Humus sludge is lighter, less dense |
Design Equations
Geometry Calculations
Radial (Circular) Tanks
Surface area:
A = π × (D/2)²Where:
A= surface area (m²)D= diameter (m)- Typical: 12-25 m diameter
Volume:
V_cylindrical = A × SWD
V_conical = (1/3) × π × r² × h_cone
V_total = V_cylindrical + V_conicalWhere:
SWD= sidewater depth (m), typically 2.0-3.0 mh_cone= conical hopper depth (m), typically 0.5-1.5 m
Rectangular Tanks
Surface area:
A = L × WVolume:
V = L × W × SWDWhere:
L= length (m), typical 15-40 mW= width (m), typical 4-10 mL:Wratio: 3:1 to 5:1
Hydraulic Calculations
Hydraulic Loading Rate (HLR)
Formula:
HLR = Q / A / 24Where:
HLR= hydraulic loading rate (m³/m²/h)Q= flow rate (m³/d)A= surface area (m²)
PS221 limits:
- All tanks in service: ≤ 1.0 m³/m²/h at FFT
- N-1 (one tank out): ≤ 2.0 m³/m²/h at FFT
Design notes:
- Check HLR at DWF, ADF, and FFT
- FFT typically controls design
- N-1 condition must be verified
Hydraulic Retention Time (HRT)
Formula:
HRT = (V / Q) × 24Where:
HRT= hydraulic retention time (hours)V= liquid volume above SWD (m³)Q= flow rate (m³/d)
PS221 minimum: 2 hours at FFT
Typical values:
- At DWF: 6-12 hours
- At ADF: 4-8 hours
- At FFT: 2-4 hours
Settling Velocity Considerations
Humus sludge has lower density and slower settling than primary sludge.
Typical Settling Velocities
| Sludge Type | Settling Velocity | Density | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary sludge | 1.5-3.0 m/h | 1.02-1.05 | Coarse, dense solids |
| Humus sludge | 0.5-1.5 m/h | 1.005-1.02 | Light biological floc |
| WAS (activated sludge) | 0.8-2.0 m/h | 1.003-1.01 | Flocculated biomass |
Design implications:
- Lower HLR limit (1.0 vs 1.2 m/h) accounts for slower settling
- Longer retention time aids flocculation
- Gentle flow regime prevents floc breakup
Upward Velocity vs Settling Velocity
For effective capture:
V_upward < 0.7 × V_settling (safety factor)PS221 HLR of 1.0 m/h provides adequate safety margin:
V_upward = 1.0 m/h
V_settling = 1.5 m/h (typical humus)
Safety factor = 1.0 / 1.5 = 0.67 ✓N-1 Compliance
With one tank out of service:
Required area calculation:
A_required = Q_FFT / HLR_max / 24
A_provided = n × A_single
A_N-1 = (n-1) × A_single
For compliance: A_N-1 ≥ A_required (at HLR = 2.0 m/h)Design approach: For 2 tanks (minimum):
- Each tank must handle FFT/2 at ≤ 1.0 m/h (both in service)
- Single tank must handle FFT at ≤ 2.0 m/h (N-1 condition)
Example:
FFT = 1,800 m³/d
All tanks in service (n=2):
A_required = 1800 / 1.0 / 24 = 75 m² per tank minimum
A_total = 150 m²
N-1 (one tank out):
A_single = 75 m²
HLR_N-1 = 1800 / 75 / 24 = 1.0 m/h ✓ (< 2.0 m/h limit)Humus Sludge Capture
Capture Efficiency
Typical humus sludge capture:
Capture_efficiency = 85%This means 85% of biofilter biomass production is captured; 15% passes to effluent as dispersed solids.
Humus Sludge Production
Formula:
Sludge_solids = Biomass_biofilter × (E_capture / 100)
Sludge_flow = Sludge_solids / (DS% × 10)Where:
Biomass_biofilter= biofilter biomass production (kgSS/d)E_capture= capture efficiency (%, typically 85%)DS%= humus sludge dry solids (%, typically 2%)
Humus sludge characteristics:
- Dry solids: 1.5-2.5% (typically 2%)
- Volatile solids: 70-80% of DS
- Specific gravity: 1.005-1.015
- Color: Brown (aerobic) or grey-black (partly anaerobic)
Example:
Biofilter biomass = 100 kgSS/d
Capture = 85%
DS = 2%
Sludge_solids = 100 × 0.85 = 85 kgSS/d
Sludge_flow = 85 / (2 × 10) = 4.25 m³/dWorked Example
Design Basis
- FFT: 1,800 m³/d
- DWF: 600 m³/d
- ADF: 960 m³/d (DWF × 1.6)
- Biofilter biomass production: 48 kgSS/d
Step 1: Size for HLR Compliance
All tanks in service (at FFT):
A_required = Q_FFT / HLR_max / 24
A_required = 1800 / 1.0 / 24 = 75 m²
For 2 tanks: A_per_tank = 37.5 m²Try D = 15 m per tank:
A = π × (15/2)² = 176.7 m² per tank
A_total = 176.7 × 2 = 353.4 m²This is conservative (much larger than minimum 75 m²).
Step 2: Check HLR at All Flows
At DWF:
HLR = 600 / 353.4 / 24 = 0.071 m/h ✓
(Well below limit)At ADF:
HLR = 960 / 353.4 / 24 = 0.113 m/h ✓At FFT:
HLR = 1800 / 353.4 / 24 = 0.212 m/h ✓
(Well below 1.0 m/h limit)Step 3: Check N-1 Compliance
With one tank out (area = 176.7 m²):
HLR_N-1 = 1800 / 176.7 / 24 = 0.424 m/h ✓
(Well below 2.0 m/h limit)Step 4: Determine Tank Depth
Choose SWD = 2.5 m, conical depth = 1.0 m
Liquid volume (cylindrical):
V_liquid = A × SWD
V_liquid = 353.4 × 2.5 = 883.5 m³Total volume (including conical hoppers):
V_cone_each = (1/3) × π × (7.5)² × 1.0 = 58.9 m³
V_total = 883.5 + (2 × 58.9) = 1,001.3 m³Step 5: Check HRT
At DWF:
HRT = (883.5 / 600) × 24 = 35.3 hoursAt ADF:
HRT = (883.5 / 960) × 24 = 22.1 hoursAt FFT:
HRT = (883.5 / 1800) × 24 = 11.8 hours ✓
(Well above 2 hour minimum)N-1 at FFT:
V_single = 176.7 × 2.5 = 441.8 m³
HRT_N-1 = (441.8 / 1800) × 24 = 5.9 hours ✓Step 6: Calculate Humus Sludge Production
Capture from biofilter:
Sludge_solids = 48 × 0.85 = 40.8 kgSS/dSludge flow (at 2% DS):
Sludge_flow = 40.8 / (2 × 10) = 2.04 m³/dDesign Summary
| Parameter | Value | Compliance |
|---|---|---|
| Configuration | 2 × 15 m diameter | ✓ N-1 capable |
| SWD | 2.5 m | ✓ > 2.0 m |
| Total surface area | 353.4 m² | |
| Liquid volume | 883.5 m³ | |
| HLR at DWF | 0.071 m/h | ✓ |
| HLR at FFT | 0.212 m/h | ✓ < 1.0 m/h |
| HLR N-1 at FFT | 0.424 m/h | ✓ < 2.0 m/h |
| HRT at DWF | 35.3 hours | ✓ |
| HRT at FFT | 11.8 hours | ✓ > 2 hours |
| HRT N-1 at FFT | 5.9 hours | ✓ > 2 hours |
| Humus sludge | 2.04 m³/d at 2% DS |
UK Water Company Variations
UK Industry Practice
- HLR: 0.8 m/h preferred at FFT (more conservative than 1.0)
- SWD: 2.5-3.0 m typical
- Minimum 2 tanks, prefer 3 for larger works (> 10,000 PE)
UK Industry Practice
- HLR: 1.0 m/h at FFT (as per PS221)
- Rectangular tanks common for large works
- Combined biofilter/humus tank duty in process design
UK Industry Practice
- N-1 strictly enforced for all new works
- HRT: 3 hours minimum preferred at FFT
- Covered tanks for odor control in urban catchments
Design Considerations
Tank Configuration
Radial tanks advantages:
- Simple sludge collection (rotating scraper)
- Good for small-medium works (PE < 20,000)
- Compact footprint
- Well-proven technology
Rectangular tanks advantages:
- Better for large works (PE > 20,000)
- Multiple lanes possible
- Chain-and-flight scrapers robust
- Easier integration with rectangular biofilters
Inlet Arrangements
Radial tanks:
- Central feed well with stilling chamber
- Diameter = 10-15% of tank diameter
- Inlet velocity < 0.3 m/s
- Radial baffles to dissipate energy
Rectangular tanks:
- End-feed with baffle wall
- Full-width distribution channel
- Submerged inlet (avoid surface turbulence)
Outlet Arrangements
Weir configuration:
- Peripheral weir for radial tanks (full circumference)
- End weir for rectangular tanks (full width)
- V-notch weirs for even flow distribution
Weir loading:
W_load = Q / L_weirTypical: < 150 m³/m/d (same as primary tanks)
Sludge Collection
Radial tanks:
- Rotating scraper bridge: 0.02-0.05 rpm
- Hopper diameter: 1.5-3.0 m
- Continuous or intermittent withdrawal
Rectangular tanks:
- Chain-and-flight scrapers
- Scraper speed: 0.6-1.2 m/min
- Hoppers at inlet end
Sludge withdrawal:
- Frequency: Every 2-4 hours typical
- Duration: 10-15 minutes per cycle
- Desludging rate: Balance concentration vs volume
Common Design Issues
Poor Sludge Settlement
Problem: High effluent SS, blanket rising.
Causes:
- Excessive HLR (> 1.2 m/h)
- Biofilter overloading (poor floc formation)
- Denitrification in sludge blanket (N₂ gas flotation)
- Septicity (H₂S production, gas bubbles)
Solutions:
- Reduce HLR (add tank area or reduce flow to FFT)
- Optimize biofilter loading
- Increase sludge withdrawal frequency
- Avoid long sludge retention (< 4 hours in tank)
Denitrification in Blanket
Problem: Sludge blanket floats due to N₂ gas from nitrate reduction.
Mechanism:
NO₃⁻ + organic carbon → N₂ (gas) + CO₂Gas bubbles attach to sludge floc, causing flotation.
Solutions:
- Increase sludge withdrawal rate (reduce blanket depth)
- Reduce nitrate in biofilter (lower recirculation)
- Avoid high sludge blanket levels (< 0.5 m typical)
- Consider de-nitrification filter upstream
Insufficient N-1 Capacity
Problem: Works cannot operate with one tank out.
Solution:
- Size for N-1 from start (each tank handles full FFT at 2.0 m/h)
- For 2-tank configuration, this means 50% oversizing vs nominal
- Or use 3 tanks with each at 67% capacity
Hydraulic Overloading in Storms
Problem: Solids carryover during storm flows.
Solutions:
- Storm flow diversion upstream (limit to FFT = 6 DWF)
- Storm tanks to attenuate peak flows
- Chemically-assisted settlement (PAC dosing)
Effluent Polishing
Humus tanks provide additional BOD/NH₃ polishing beyond biofilter.
Additional Removal in Humus Tank
| Parameter | Biofilter Effluent | Humus Tank Effluent | Additional Removal |
|---|---|---|---|
| BOD | 30-40 mg/L | 15-25 mg/L | 15-25% |
| SS | 30-50 mg/L | 15-25 mg/L | 50% (biomass capture) |
| NH₄-N | 6-8 mg/L | 5-7 mg/L | 10-15% |
Mechanisms:
- SS removal: Gravity settling of sloughed biomass
- BOD removal: Continued oxidation in biofilm on settled solids
- NH₄-N removal: Nitrification in thin biofilm on tank surfaces
Liquor Return from Sludge Thickening
Humus sludge is often thickened before disposal, producing a liquor return stream.
Typical Liquor Characteristics
| Parameter | Concentration (mg/L) | Return Load Contribution |
|---|---|---|
| TSS | 500 | Low (< 5% influent) |
| BOD | 750 | Medium (10-15% influent) |
| NH₄-N | 100 | High (20-30% influent) |
| TP | 10 | Low (5-10% influent) |
Design impact:
- Return liquor to inlet works (before primary tanks)
- Account for loads in overall mass balance
- NH₄-N return can be significant (consider in alkalinity balance)
Liquor return calculation:
Load_return = (C × Q_liquor) / 1000Where:
C= pollutant concentration in liquor (mg/L)Q_liquor= liquor flow rate (m³/d)
Related Calculations
- Biofilters: Biomass production feeding humus tanks
- Sludge Production: Humus sludge handling and storage
- Alkalinity Balance: Return liquor NH₄-N impact
References
- UK Sewers for Adoption (7th Edition): Appendix PS221 - Humus Tanks
- UK operator Design Standards: Secondary settling design criteria
- WRc/CIRIA: Final clarifier design for biological treatment
Navigation: