Skip to content

Rectangular Primary Clarifier ​

Longitudinal flow primary sedimentation tank with chain-and-flight sludge collection mechanism for high-capacity installations.

Overview ​

The rectangular primary clarifier is preferred for large-capacity installations where multiple parallel tanks are required. The longitudinal flow pattern provides better hydraulic characteristics and the chain-and-flight mechanism offers reliable sludge removal.

When to Use ​

  • Large municipal plants (>50,000 PE)
  • Space-constrained sites (better land utilization)
  • Multiple parallel tank requirements
  • High-capacity industrial pretreatment

Advantages Over Circular ​

  • Better space efficiency for multiple tanks
  • Simpler common-wall construction
  • More predictable hydraulics (plug flow tendency)
  • Higher tanks-in-series equivalency (N=5-8 vs 3-5)

Settling Theory ​

Type I & II Settling ​

Rectangular clarifiers follow the same settling theory as circular:

Stokes' Law (Type I): $$V_s = \frac{g \times d^2 \times (\rho_s - \rho_w)}{18 \times \mu}$$

Camp Formula (Type II): $$\eta = 1 - \left(1 + \frac{n \times V_s \times t}{H}\right)^{-1/n}$$

Enhanced Plug Flow Behavior ​

Rectangular tanks approach plug flow behavior more closely:

$$E(\theta) = N^N \times \theta^{N-1} \times \frac{e^{-N\theta}}{(N-1)!}$$

Where:

  • $E(\theta)$ = exit age distribution
  • $\theta$ = dimensionless time (t/HRT)
  • $N$ = tanks-in-series (5-8 for rectangular)

Design Equations ​

Surface Area ​

$$A = L \times W$$

Where:

  • $L$ = tank length (m)
  • $W$ = tank width (m)

Length-to-Width Ratio ​

Optimal L:W ratio ranges from 3:1 to 5:1:

$$\frac{L}{W} = 3 \text{ to } 5$$

Surface Overflow Rate ​

$$SOR = \frac{Q}{A} = \frac{Q}{L \times W \times N_{tanks}}$$

Horizontal Velocity ​

Critical for rectangular tanks to prevent scour:

$$v_h = \frac{Q}{W \times SWD}$$

Design limit: $v_h < 0.015$ m/s (to prevent settled solids resuspension)

Scour Velocity (Camp) ​

$$v_{scour} = \left(\frac{8 \times k \times (\rho_s - \rho_w) \times g \times d}{f \times \rho_w}\right)^{0.5}$$

Where:

  • $k$ = 0.04 for unigranular particles
  • $f$ = Darcy-Weisbach friction factor (0.02-0.03)

Short-Circuiting Model ​

Rectangular tanks have better hydraulic efficiency:

Tanks-in-Series Equivalency ​

ConfigurationN ValueEfficiency Factor
Circular (radial)3-50.75-0.83
Rectangular (no baffles)5-80.83-0.89
Rectangular (with baffles)8-120.89-0.92

Effective Removal ​

$$\eta_{eff} = \eta_{ideal} \times \frac{N}{N+1}$$

For N=6: efficiency factor = 0.857

Parameters ​

Geometric Parameters ​

ParameterSymbolUnitRangeDefaultDescription
LengthLm20-8040Tank length
WidthWm5-2010Tank width
Sidewater DepthSWDm2.5-5.03.0Min PS208: 2.5m
L:W Ratio--3:1-5:14:1Optimal flow
Floor Slope-%1-21.5Longitudinal slope
Number of TanksN-2-84For redundancy

Mechanical Parameters ​

ParameterUnitRangeDefaultDescription
Flight Speedm/min0.5-1.51.0Chain-flight speed
Flight Spacingm1.5-3.02.0Between flights
Scraper Type-chain/reciprocatingchainMechanism type

Hydraulic Criteria (UK PS208) ​

ParameterUnitDWF LimitFFT Limit
Surface Overflow Ratem³/m²/d28.848.0
Upflow Velocitym/h1.22.0
HRThours>2.0>2.0
Horizontal Velocitym/s<0.015<0.025
Weir Loadingm³/m/d<300<500

Advanced Parameters ​

ParameterUnitDefaultRangeDescription
shortCircuitFactor-65-10Higher than circular
flocculationParameter-0.350.2-0.5Camp n value
baffleConfiguration-nonenone/transverseFlow control
inletType-weirweir/submergedEntry distribution
outletType-weirweir/launderExit collection

Inlet and Outlet Design ​

Inlet Zone ​

Weir Inlet: $$q_{weir} = \frac{Q}{L_{weir}}$$

Distribute flow evenly across tank width.

Energy Dissipation:

  • Baffle wall at 1-2m from inlet
  • Perforated baffle (5-10% open area)
  • Depth > 0.5 × SWD

Outlet Zone ​

V-Notch Weirs: $$Q = 1.38 \times H^{2.5}$$

Launders:

  • Multiple parallel launders
  • Spacing 2-4m
  • Submerged orifices optional

Sludge Collection ​

Chain-and-Flight System ​

Components:

  1. Return flight (bottom) - collects sludge to hopper
  2. Forward flight (surface) - pushes scum to scum box

Sizing: $$P = k \times L \times W \times SWD$$

Where P = motor power (kW), k = 0.001-0.003

Hopper Design ​

Located at inlet end (counter-current to flow):

$$V_{hopper} = t_{storage} \times Q_{sludge}$$

Typical storage: 2-8 hours

Removal Efficiencies ​

Same as circular clarifiers (settling physics identical):

Without Chemical Dosing ​

ParameterRemoval (%)
BOD25-35
TSS50-65
COD25-40
NH₃-N0
Total P10-20

With Chemical Dosing ​

ParameterRemoval (%)
BOD35-45
TSS60-75
COD35-50
NH₃-N0
Total P60-85

Configuration ​

Step-by-Step Setup ​

  1. Define Geometry

    • Select tank type: Rectangular
    • Enter length and width
    • Verify L:W ratio (3:1 to 5:1)
    • Set sidewater depth (min 2.5m)
    • Define floor slope (1-2%)
  2. Set Tank Count

    • Calculate required total area
    • Divide by practical single tank area
    • Ensure N-1 compliance
  3. Verify Hydraulics

    • Check SOR < limits
    • Verify horizontal velocity < 0.015 m/s
    • Confirm HRT > 2 hours
  4. Configure Mechanical

    • Select collector mechanism
    • Set flight speed
    • Configure hopper capacity

Example Configuration ​

json
{
  "type": "primaryClarifierRectangular",
  "parameters": {
    "length": 40,
    "width": 10,
    "sidewaterDepth": 3.0,
    "floorSlope": 1.5,
    "numberOfTanks": 4,
    "chemicalDosing": false,
    "calculationMode": "advanced",
    "advancedParams": {
      "shortCircuitFactor": 6,
      "flocculationParameter": 0.35,
      "baffleConfiguration": "transverse",
      "flightSpeed": 1.0
    }
  }
}

Worked Example ​

Given ​

  • Population: 100,000 PE
  • DWF: 25,000 m³/d
  • FFT: 75,000 m³/d
  • Influent TSS: 350 mg/L

Design ​

Step 1: Calculate Required Area

Target SOR at FFT = 40 m³/m²/d

$$A_{required} = \frac{75,000}{40} = 1,875 \text{ m}^2$$

Step 2: Select Configuration

Four tanks: 40m × 12m each

$$A_{actual} = 4 \times 40 \times 12 = 1,920 \text{ m}^2$$

L:W ratio = 40/12 = 3.33:1 ✓

Step 3: Check Upflow Velocities

At DWF: $$v_{up} = \frac{25,000}{1,920 \times 24} = 0.54 \text{ m/h}$$ ✓

At FFT: $$v_{up} = \frac{75,000}{1,920 \times 24} = 1.63 \text{ m/h}$$ ✓

Step 4: Check Horizontal Velocity

At FFT (per tank): $$v_h = \frac{75,000 / 4}{12 \times 3.0 \times 86,400} = 0.006 \text{ m/s}$$ ✓ (<0.015)

Step 5: Check HRT

Volume: $V = 1,920 \times 3.0 = 5,760$ m³

At DWF: $HRT = \frac{5,760}{25,000} \times 24 = 5.53$ hours ✓

At FFT: $HRT = \frac{5,760}{75,000} \times 24 = 1.84$ hours ⚠ (near limit)

Step 6: N-1 Check

With 3 tanks: $A_{N-1} = 1,440$ m²

At FFT: $v_{up} = \frac{75,000}{1,440 \times 24} = 2.17$ m/h ⚠ (slightly over)

Recommendation: Marginally acceptable for short-term N-1 operation.

Construction Considerations ​

Common-Wall Design ​

Multiple rectangular tanks share walls, reducing:

  • Construction cost (20-30% savings)
  • Land footprint
  • Piping complexity

Floor Construction ​

  • Longitudinal slope: 1-2%
  • Cross slope to center channel: 5-10%
  • Sludge hopper depth: 1.5-2.5m

Materials ​

ComponentMaterialNotes
WallsReinforced concreteTypical 300mm thick
FloorReinforced concreteWith slope
FlightsHDPE/FiberglassCorrosion resistant
ChainsStainless steel316L grade
WeirsAluminum/FRPAdjustable

Troubleshooting ​

IssueCauseSolution
Uneven flow distributionInlet designAdd distribution weir
Solids resuspensionHigh horizontal velocityReduce flow per tank
Poor sludge collectionFlight damageReplace worn flights
Short-circuitingDead zonesInstall baffles
Scum breakthroughWeir issuesInstall scum baffles

Best Practices ​

  1. L:W Ratio: Maintain 3:1 to 5:1 for optimal hydraulics
  2. Inlet Design: Ensure even flow distribution
  3. Baffles: Consider transverse baffles for large tanks
  4. Flight Maintenance: Regular inspection of chain tension
  5. Hopper Capacity: Size for 4-8 hours storage minimum
  6. Parallel Operation: Maintain even flow split

References ​

  1. Metcalf & Eddy (2014). Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery, 5th Ed.
  2. UK Water Industry (2020). Sewers for Adoption, 8th Ed. (PS208)
  3. WEF (2018). Design of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants, MOP 8
  4. Camp, T.R. (1946). "Sedimentation and the Design of Settling Tanks"
  5. Hazen, A. (1904). "On Sedimentation". ASCE Transactions