Appearance
Circular Primary Clarifier
Conventional center-feed primary sedimentation tank for removal of settleable solids and BOD through gravity settling.
Overview
The circular primary clarifier is the most common configuration for primary sedimentation in wastewater treatment. It features a center-feed inlet with peripheral overflow weirs and a rotating sludge collection mechanism.
When to Use
- Municipal wastewater treatment plants (>1,000 PE)
- Industrial pretreatment facilities
- Sites with space for circular footprint
- Applications requiring robust, proven technology
Settling Theory
Type I - Discrete Settling (Stokes' Law)
Large, discrete particles settle independently according to Stokes' Law:
$$V_s = \frac{g \times d^2 \times (\rho_s - \rho_w)}{18 \times \mu}$$
Where:
- $V_s$ = settling velocity (m/s)
- $g$ = gravitational acceleration (9.81 m/s²)
- $d$ = particle diameter (m)
- $\rho_s$ = particle density (kg/m³)
- $\rho_w$ = water density (998 kg/m³ at 20°C)
- $\mu$ = dynamic viscosity (Pa·s)
Type II - Flocculent Settling (Camp Formula)
For flocculating particles that aggregate during settling:
$$\eta = 1 - \left(1 + \frac{n \times V_s \times t}{H}\right)^{-1/n}$$
Where:
- $\eta$ = removal efficiency (fraction)
- $n$ = flocculation parameter (0.2-0.5, typically 0.35)
- $t$ = detention time (s)
- $H$ = settling depth (m)
Temperature Effects on Viscosity
Viscosity varies significantly with temperature, affecting settling:
$$\mu(T) = \mu(20°C) \times 1.002^{(20-T)}$$
| Temperature (°C) | Relative Viscosity | Effect on Settling |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 1.52 | -34% efficiency |
| 10 | 1.31 | -23% efficiency |
| 15 | 1.14 | -12% efficiency |
| 20 | 1.00 | Baseline |
| 25 | 0.89 | +12% efficiency |
| 30 | 0.80 | +25% efficiency |
Design Equations
Surface Overflow Rate (SOR)
$$SOR = \frac{Q}{A} = \frac{Q}{\pi \times (D/2)^2}$$
Where:
- $Q$ = flow rate (m³/d)
- $A$ = surface area (m²)
- $D$ = tank diameter (m)
Hydraulic Retention Time (HRT)
$$HRT = \frac{V}{Q} = \frac{A \times SWD}{Q}$$
Where:
- $V$ = tank volume (m³)
- $SWD$ = sidewater depth (m)
Weir Loading Rate
$$WLR = \frac{Q}{\pi \times D}$$
Where:
- $WLR$ = weir loading rate (m³/m/d)
Upflow Velocity
$$v_{up} = \frac{Q}{A \times 24}$$
Converting to m/h for comparison with design criteria.
Particle Size Distribution Model
ErgoPlanner uses a 5-class velocity distribution for realistic modeling:
| Class | Settling Velocity (m/h) | TSS Fraction | Typical Particles |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.1 | 5% | Colloidal, fine organics |
| 2 | 0.5 | 15% | Fine suspended solids |
| 3 | 2.0 | 40% | Medium organic flocs |
| 4 | 5.0 | 30% | Coarse settleable solids |
| 5 | 10.0 | 10% | Very coarse, grit |
Per-Class Removal Efficiency
For each particle class:
$$\eta_i = \begin{cases} 1 & \text{if } V_{s,i} > SOR \ V_{s,i} / SOR & \text{if } V_{s,i} \leq SOR \end{cases}$$
Total TSS removal:
$$\eta_{TSS} = \sum_{i=1}^{5} f_i \times \eta_i$$
Short-Circuiting Model
Real tanks experience short-circuiting, reducing effective detention time:
Tanks-in-Series (TIS) Model
$$N_{tanks} = \frac{t_{actual}}{t_{ideal}}$$
For circular clarifiers: $N = 3-5$ typically
The effective removal with short-circuiting:
$$\eta_{eff} = \eta_{ideal} \times \left(\frac{N}{N+1}\right)$$
Particulate Nutrient Removal
Nutrients bound to settleable solids are removed proportionally:
$$TP_{removed} = TSS_{removed} \times \frac{f_{pP}}{TSS_{inlet}}$$
$$TKN_{removed} = TSS_{removed} \times \frac{f_{pN}}{TSS_{inlet}}$$
$$COD_{removed} = TSS_{removed} \times \frac{f_{pCOD}}{TSS_{inlet}}$$
Where:
- $f_{pP}$ = particulate P fraction (20-60%, typically 40%)
- $f_{pN}$ = particulate N fraction (15-45%, typically 30%)
- $f_{pCOD}$ = particulate COD fraction
Parameters
Design Parameters
| Parameter | Symbol | Unit | Range | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter | D | m | 10-60 | 25 | Tank diameter |
| Sidewater Depth | SWD | m | 2.5-5.0 | 3.0 | Minimum PS208: 2.5m |
| Floor Slope | - | ° | 8-15 | 10 | Toward center hopper |
| Number of Tanks | N | - | 2-6 | 2 | Minimum 2 for N-1 |
Hydraulic Criteria (UK PS208)
| Parameter | Unit | DWF Limit | FFT Limit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surface Overflow Rate | m³/m²/d | 28.8 | 48.0 |
| Upflow Velocity | m/h | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| HRT | hours | >2.0 | >2.0 |
| Weir Loading | m³/m/d | <300 | <500 |
Advanced Parameters (Mechanistic Mode)
| Parameter | Unit | Default | Range | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| settlingVelocityDistribution | - | default | 5-class | Particle velocity classes |
| flocculationParameter | - | 0.35 | 0.2-0.5 | Camp formula n value |
| shortCircuitFactor | - | 4 | 2-10 | Tanks-in-series N |
| temperature | °C | 15 | 5-30 | Affects viscosity |
| particulatePFraction | % | 40 | 20-60 | P in particulate form |
| particulateNFraction | % | 30 | 15-45 | N in particulate form |
| sludgeDensity | kg/m³ | 1020 | 1010-1050 | Settled sludge density |
| compressionTime | h | 4 | 2-8 | Sludge compression time |
Removal Efficiencies
Without Chemical Dosing
| Parameter | Removal (%) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| BOD | 25-35 | Primarily particulate |
| TSS | 50-65 | Design dependent |
| COD | 25-40 | Particulate fraction |
| NH₃-N | 0 | Dissolved, not removed |
| Total P | 10-20 | Particulate only |
With Chemical Dosing (Fe/Al)
| Parameter | Removal (%) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| BOD | 35-45 | Enhanced flocculation |
| TSS | 60-75 | Chemical precipitation |
| COD | 35-50 | Enhanced |
| NH₃-N | 0 | Not affected |
| Total P | 60-85 | Primary removal mechanism |
Sludge Production
Primary Sludge Characteristics
| Parameter | Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Dry Solids | 2-5 | % DS |
| Typical | 3 | % DS |
| VS/TS Ratio | 0.65-0.80 | - |
| Density | 1020-1030 | kg/m³ |
Sludge Mass Calculation
$$M_{sludge} = Q \times TSS_{inf} \times \eta_{TSS}$$
$$Q_{sludge} = \frac{M_{sludge}}{DS% \times 10}$$
Configuration
Step-by-Step Setup
Define Geometry
- Select tank type: Circular (radial)
- Enter diameter based on site constraints
- Set sidewater depth (min 2.5m per PS208)
- Define floor slope (8-15°)
Set Tank Count
- Minimum 2 tanks for N-1 redundancy
- Consider maintenance scheduling
Chemical Dosing
- Enable if P removal required
- Typical: Ferric chloride or PAC
Verify Design
- Check upflow velocity < 1.2 m/h at DWF
- Check upflow velocity < 2.0 m/h at FFT
- Verify HRT > 2 hours
- Confirm N-1 compliance
Example Configuration
json
{
"type": "primaryClarifier",
"subtype": "circular",
"parameters": {
"diameter": 25,
"sidewaterDepth": 3.0,
"floorSlope": 10,
"numberOfTanks": 2,
"chemicalDosing": false,
"calculationMode": "advanced",
"advancedParams": {
"flocculationParameter": 0.35,
"shortCircuitFactor": 4,
"temperature": 15
}
}
}N-1 Compliance
UK PS208 requires facilities to operate within limits with one tank out of service:
Verification Steps
- Calculate area/volume with (N-1) tanks
- Check upflow velocity at DWF < 1.2 m/h
- Check upflow velocity at FFT < 2.0 m/h
- Verify HRT > 2 hours at FFT
N-1 Calculations
$$A_{N-1} = A_{total} \times \frac{N-1}{N}$$
$$V_{N-1} = V_{total} \times \frac{N-1}{N}$$
Worked Example
Given
- Population: 50,000 PE
- DWF: 12,500 m³/d (250 L/PE/d)
- FFT: 37,500 m³/d (3× DWF)
- Influent TSS: 350 mg/L
- Influent BOD: 300 mg/L
Design
Step 1: Calculate Required Area
Target SOR at FFT = 40 m³/m²/d (below 48 limit)
$$A_{required} = \frac{37,500}{40} = 938 \text{ m}^2$$
Step 2: Select Configuration
Two tanks, diameter = 25m each
$$A_{actual} = 2 \times \pi \times (12.5)^2 = 982 \text{ m}^2$$
Step 3: Check Upflow Velocities
At DWF: $$v_{up} = \frac{12,500}{982 \times 24} = 0.53 \text{ m/h}$$ ✓ (<1.2)
At FFT: $$v_{up} = \frac{37,500}{982 \times 24} = 1.59 \text{ m/h}$$ ✓ (<2.0)
Step 4: Check HRT
Volume (SWD=3.0m): $V = 982 \times 3.0 = 2,946$ m³
At DWF: $HRT = \frac{2,946}{12,500} \times 24 = 5.66$ hours ✓
At FFT: $HRT = \frac{2,946}{37,500} \times 24 = 1.89$ hours ⚠ (near limit)
Step 5: N-1 Check
With one tank: $A_{N-1} = 491$ m²
At FFT: $v_{up} = \frac{37,500}{491 \times 24} = 3.18$ m/h ✗ (exceeds 2.0)
Recommendation: Add third tank or increase diameter.
Troubleshooting
| Issue | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| High effluent TSS | Hydraulic overload | Reduce flow, add tanks |
| Poor flocculation | Optimize chemical dose | |
| Short-circuiting | Install baffles | |
| Poor P removal | Insufficient chemical | Increase Fe/Al dose |
| pH too high | Adjust to 6.5-7.0 | |
| Sludge rising | Septicity/gas | Increase withdrawal |
| Too long HRT | Reduce detention | |
| Scum accumulation | Insufficient skimming | Adjust skimmer speed |
Best Practices
- Design Margin: Target 80% of maximum allowable SOR
- Redundancy: Always provide N-1 capability
- Sludge Withdrawal: Regular, frequent removal prevents septicity
- Inlet Design: Use center well for energy dissipation
- Weir Level: Maintain level weirs for even flow distribution
- Temperature Monitoring: Adjust expectations for cold water
Related Topics
- Rectangular-Primary-Clarifier
- Lamella-Primary-Clarifier
- Secondary-Clarifier
- Chemical-Dosing
References
- Metcalf & Eddy (2014). Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery, 5th Ed.
- UK Water Industry (2020). Sewers for Adoption, 8th Ed. (PS208)
- WEF (2018). Design of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants, MOP 8
- Camp, T.R. (1946). "Sedimentation and the Design of Settling Tanks"