Appearance
SBR - Sequencing Batch Reactor
Time-based treatment system combining biological reaction and settling in a single tank through sequential operational phases.
Overview
The Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) performs all treatment steps in a single vessel through timed phases: Fill, React, Settle, Decant, and Idle. This eliminates the need for a separate secondary clarifier and provides operational flexibility.
When to Use
- Small to medium plants (<50,000 PE)
- Variable flow applications
- Limited space sites
- Nutrient removal requirements
- Phased construction projects
Key Characteristics
- Single vessel for reaction and settling
- Time-based rather than space-based treatment
- Excellent nutrient removal capability
- Ideal settling conditions (quiescent)
- Flexible operation for varying loads
Operating Cycle
Standard 5-Phase Cycle
mermaid
graph LR
A[Fill] --> B[React]
B --> C[Settle]
C --> D[Decant]
D --> E[Idle]
E --> APhase Details
| Phase | Duration | Activity | Typical % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fill | 1-3 h | Influent addition | 15-25% |
| React | 2-6 h | Mixing/aeration | 35-50% |
| Settle | 0.5-1.5 h | Quiescent settling | 10-20% |
| Decant | 0.5-1 h | Effluent withdrawal | 10-15% |
| Idle | 0-1 h | Standby/sludge waste | 0-10% |
Total cycle: 4-12 hours (typically 6-8 hours)
Nutrient Removal Cycles
BNR Configuration:
- Fill (anoxic) - denitrification with RAS nitrate
- Fill (anaerobic) - P release, VFA uptake
- React (aerobic) - BOD oxidation, nitrification, P uptake
- React (anoxic) - post-denitrification
- Settle - clarification
- Decant - effluent withdrawal
Biokinetics
Fill Phase Kinetics
Static Fill (no mixing):
- Stratification occurs
- Minimal reaction
- Anaerobic conditions develop
Mixed Fill (anoxic): $$r_{denit} = \mu_{max} \times \eta_g \times \frac{S}{K_s + S} \times \frac{NO_3}{K_{NO} + NO_3} \times X$$
Aerated Fill:
- Begins BOD oxidation
- Dilutes high substrate concentrations
React Phase Kinetics
Standard ASM kinetics apply - see CSTR for equations.
Key difference: Batch kinetics rather than continuous:
$$\frac{dS}{dt} = -\mu_{max} \times \frac{S}{K_s + S} \times X / Y$$
Integrated for batch: $$t = \frac{Y}{μ_{max} \times X} \times \left[S_0 - S + K_s \times \ln\frac{S_0}{S}\right]$$
Design Equations
Volume Calculation
$$V_{total} = V_{fill} + V_{sludge} + V_{freeboard}$$
Where: $$V_{fill} = Q_{avg} \times t_{cycle} \times n_{cycles/day}$$
Decant Volume
$$V_{decant} = V_{fill} = \frac{Q_{avg}}{n_{cycles}}$$
Number of Basins
For continuous flow treatment:
- Minimum 2 basins for redundancy
- 3+ basins for larger flows
- Allows continuous receipt of influent
Exchange Ratio
$$VER = \frac{V_{fill}}{V_{total}} = 15-35%$$
Lower VER → higher treatment intensity per cycle.
F:M Ratio
$$F:M = \frac{Q \times S_0}{V \times X \times VER}$$
Adjusted for batch operation.
Parameters
Operational Parameters
| Parameter | Unit | Default | Range | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cycle time | hours | 6 | 4-12 | Total cycle duration |
| Fill time | hours | 1.5 | 0.5-3 | Influent addition |
| React time | hours | 3 | 2-6 | Biological treatment |
| Settle time | hours | 1 | 0.5-2 | Clarification |
| Decant time | hours | 0.5 | 0.3-1 | Effluent withdrawal |
| VER | % | 25 | 15-35 | Volume exchange ratio |
| Cycles/day | - | 4 | 2-6 | Number of cycles |
Tank Parameters
| Parameter | Unit | Default | Range | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volume | m³ | calculated | - | Per basin |
| Depth | m | 5 | 4-7 | Operating depth |
| Freeboard | m | 0.5 | 0.3-1 | Above max level |
| Number of basins | - | 2 | 2-6 | For continuity |
| Decanter type | - | floating | fixed/floating | Withdrawal |
Biological Parameters
| Parameter | Unit | Default | Range | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLSS | mg/L | 4000 | 3000-6000 | Mixed liquor |
| SRT | days | 15 | 10-25 | Solids retention |
| DO setpoint | mg/L | 2.0 | 1.5-4.0 | During aeration |
| SVI | mL/g | 100 | 50-150 | Sludge volume index |
Nutrient Removal
Nitrogen Removal
Pre-anoxic strategy:
- Anoxic fill uses influent COD
- RAS provides nitrate
- 60-80% N removal typical
Post-anoxic strategy:
- Additional anoxic phase after nitrification
- May require supplemental carbon
Phosphorus Removal
Anaerobic/aerobic cycling:
- Anaerobic fill - VFA uptake, P release
- Aerobic react - luxury P uptake
- Settle and waste P-rich sludge
Achieve <1 mg/L effluent P.
Combined BNR
| Phase | DO | Function |
|---|---|---|
| Fill 1 | 0 (anaerobic) | P release |
| Fill 2 | 0 (anoxic) | Denitrification |
| React 1 | >2 (aerobic) | BOD, nitrification, P uptake |
| React 2 | 0 (anoxic) | Post-denit |
| Settle | 0 | Clarification |
Configuration
Example Configuration
json
{
"type": "sbr",
"id": "sbr-basin-1",
"parameters": {
"volume": 2500,
"depth": 5,
"numberOfBasins": 2,
"cycleTime": 6,
"phases": {
"fill": {
"duration": 1.5,
"mode": "anoxic-then-aerobic",
"anoxicFraction": 0.6
},
"react": {
"duration": 3.0,
"aerobicFraction": 0.7,
"anoxicFraction": 0.3
},
"settle": {
"duration": 1.0
},
"decant": {
"duration": 0.5,
"decanterType": "floating"
}
},
"mlss": 4000,
"srt": 15,
"doSetpoint": 2.0
}
}Worked Example
Given
- Flow: 5,000 m³/d
- BOD: 200 mg/L, TN: 40 mg/L, TP: 8 mg/L
- Targets: BOD <20, TN <10, TP <1 mg/L
- 6-hour cycle time
Design
Step 1: Number of Cycles $$n = 24/6 = 4 \text{ cycles/day}$$
Step 2: Fill Volume Per Cycle $$V_{fill} = 5,000/4 = 1,250 \text{ m}^3/\text{cycle}$$
Step 3: Total Volume (VER = 25%) $$V_{total} = 1,250/0.25 = 5,000 \text{ m}^3$$
Step 4: With 2 Basins $$V_{basin} = 5,000/2 = 2,500 \text{ m}^3$$
Step 5: Dimensions At depth = 5m: $$A = 2,500/5 = 500 \text{ m}^2$$
Square: 22.4m × 22.4m
Step 6: MLSS Check $$F:M = \frac{5,000 \times 200 \times 10^{-3}}{5,000 \times 4 \times 0.25} = 0.2 \text{ kg/kg/d}$$ ✓
Troubleshooting
| Issue | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Poor settling | Short settle time | Extend settle phase |
| High SVI | Reduce SRT, add selector | |
| Floating sludge | Denitrification in settle | Extend anoxic phase |
| Poor N removal | Insufficient anoxic time | Adjust phase times |
| Poor P removal | No anaerobic phase | Add anaerobic fill |
| Effluent TSS | Decanter issues | Adjust withdrawal rate |
Advantages vs Conventional
| Aspect | SBR | Conventional |
|---|---|---|
| Clarifier | Not needed | Required |
| RAS pumping | Not needed | Required |
| Footprint | 30-50% smaller | Baseline |
| Flexibility | High | Low |
| Equalization | Built-in | Separate |
| Complexity | Control system | Simple |
Related Topics
- CSTR - Continuously Stirred Tank Reactor
- Granular-SBR - Granular Sludge SBR
- Nutrient-Removal
- SBR-Control-Strategies
References
- Wilderer, P.A. et al. (2001). Sequencing Batch Reactor Technology. IWA Publishing.
- EPA (1999). Sequencing Batch Reactors. EPA/625/R-99/010.
- WEF (2018). Design of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants, MOP 8.