Appearance
Secondary Clarifier
Gravity settling for separation of biological solids from treated effluent in activated sludge systems
Overview
Secondary clarifiers perform the critical dual function of clarification (producing low-TSS effluent) and thickening (concentrating return activated sludge, RAS). Unlike primary clarifiers that handle discrete particle settling, secondary clarifiers must handle flocculent biological solids with complex settling characteristics including hindered settling, compression, and potential for rising sludge due to denitrification.
The performance of secondary clarifiers directly impacts the entire activated sludge system. Inadequate clarifier capacity leads to solids carryover in the effluent, loss of biomass from the system, and reduced SRT. Conversely, poor thickening results in dilute RAS, requiring higher recycle ratios and potentially hydraulic overload of the aeration basin.
Secondary clarifiers are typically circular (15-60m diameter) with center-feed mechanisms or rectangular with end-feed configurations. Design is based on solids flux theory, which considers both gravity settling and hydraulic transport of solids. The limiting solids flux determines the maximum solids loading the clarifier can handle while maintaining both clarification and thickening functions.
Theory and Equations
Basic Mode
Simple effluent quality based on typical secondary clarifier performance:
$$\text{TSS}{effluent} = \text{TSS}$$
$$\text{BOD}{effluent} = \text{BOD}$$
$$\text{RAS concentration} = X_{RAS,typical}$$
Where:
- $\text{TSS}_{typical}$ = typical effluent TSS (5-30 mg/L)
- $\text{BOD}_{effluent,typical}$ = effluent BOD (5-20 mg/L)
- $X_{RAS,typical}$ = typical RAS concentration (8,000-12,000 mg/L)
RAS Flow Calculation:
To maintain target MLSS in aeration basin:
$$Q_{RAS} = Q \times \frac{X_{MLSS}}{X_{RAS} - X_{MLSS}}$$
Where:
- $Q$ = influent flow (m³/d)
- $X_{MLSS}$ = mixed liquor SS in aeration basin (mg/L)
- $X_{RAS}$ = return activated sludge concentration (mg/L)
Advanced Mode
Solids Flux Theory:
Total solids flux is the sum of gravity settling flux and bulk transport flux:
$$G_{total} = G_{gravity} + G_{bulk}$$
$$G_{gravity} = v_s(X) \times X$$
$$G_{bulk} = v_{bulk} \times X$$
Where:
- $G_{total}$ = total solids flux (kg/m²·h)
- $G_{gravity}$ = gravity settling flux (kg/m²·h)
- $G_{bulk}$ = bulk hydraulic flux (kg/m²·h)
- $v_s(X)$ = settling velocity as function of concentration (m/h)
- $v_{bulk}$ = bulk hydraulic velocity (m/h)
- $X$ = solids concentration (kg/m³)
Vesilind Settling Velocity:
$$v_s(X) = v_0 \times e^{-k \cdot X}$$
Where:
- $v_0$ = maximum settling velocity (m/h)
- $k$ = settling parameter (m³/kg)
- $X$ = solids concentration (kg/m³)
Takács Settling Model:
$$v_s(X) = \max\left(0, \min\left(v_0, \frac{v_0 \cdot (e^{-r_h(X-X_{min})} - e^{-r_p(X-X_{min})})}{e^{-r_h \cdot X_{min}} - e^{-r_p \cdot X_{min}}}\right)\right)$$
Where:
- $v_0$ = maximum settling velocity (m/h)
- $r_h$ = hindered settling parameter (m³/kg)
- $r_p$ = flocculent settling parameter (m³/kg)
- $X_{min}$ = minimum attainable concentration (kg/m³)
State Point Analysis:
The limiting solids flux is found at the intersection of underflow and overflow lines:
$$G_{limit} = \min(G_{overflow}, G_{underflow})$$
$$G_{overflow} = v_s(X_f) \times X_f + \frac{Q}{A} \times X_f$$
$$G_{underflow} = v_s(X_u) \times X_u - \frac{Q_u}{A} \times X_u$$
Where:
- $X_f$ = feed solids concentration (kg/m³)
- $X_u$ = underflow solids concentration (kg/m³)
- $Q$ = overflow rate (m³/h)
- $Q_u$ = underflow rate (m³/h)
- $A$ = surface area (m²)
Solids Loading Rate (SLR):
$$\text{SLR} = \frac{(Q + Q_{RAS}) \times X_{MLSS}}{A}$$
Where:
- $\text{SLR}$ = solids loading rate (kg/m²·h)
- $Q$ = influent flow (m³/h)
- $Q_{RAS}$ = RAS flow (m³/h)
- $X_{MLSS}$ = mixed liquor concentration (kg/m³)
- $A$ = surface area (m²)
Sludge Volume Index (SVI):
$$\text{SVI} = \frac{\text{Settled volume (mL/L)} \times 1000}{\text{MLSS (mg/L)}}$$
A key indicator of sludge settleability:
- SVI < 100: Excellent settling
- SVI 100-150: Good settling
- SVI 150-200: Fair settling, potential issues
- SVI > 200: Poor settling, bulking sludge
Model Parameters
Basic Mode Parameters
| Parameter | Symbol | Unit | Default | Range | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effluent TSS | TSS_eff | mg/L | 15 | 5-30 | Typical effluent suspended solids |
| RAS Concentration | X_RAS | mg/L | 10,000 | 8,000-15,000 | Return activated sludge concentration |
| MLSS Target | X_MLSS | mg/L | 3,000 | 2,000-5,000 | Mixed liquor suspended solids |
Advanced Mode Parameters
| Parameter | Symbol | Unit | Default | Range | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surface Area | A | m² | - | - | Clarifier surface area |
| Side Water Depth | H | m | 4.0 | 3.5-5.0 | Depth from surface to bottom |
| Max Settling Velocity | v₀ | m/h | 8.0 | 4.0-15.0 | Maximum settling velocity |
| Vesilind k Parameter | k | m³/kg | 0.45 | 0.30-0.80 | Vesilind settling parameter |
| Takács rₕ Parameter | rₕ | m³/kg | 0.000576 | 0.0003-0.001 | Hindered settling parameter |
| Takács rₚ Parameter | rₚ | m³/kg | 0.00286 | 0.001-0.005 | Flocculent settling parameter |
| Min Concentration | X_min | kg/m³ | 0.0001 | 0.00001-0.001 | Minimum attainable concentration |
| MLSS | X_MLSS | mg/L | 3,000 | 2,000-5,000 | Mixed liquor suspended solids |
| RAS Ratio | r | - | 0.50 | 0.25-1.50 | RAS flow / influent flow |
Design Criteria
| Parameter | Typical Range | Peak Range | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surface Overflow Rate | 16-32 m³/m²/d | 40-50 m³/m²/d | Based on Q + Q_RAS |
| Solids Loading Rate | 100-150 kg/m²/d | 200-250 kg/m²/d | Critical parameter |
| Side Water Depth | 3.5-5.0 m | - | Circular clarifiers |
| Weir Loading | 125-250 m³/m/d | 375 m³/m/d | Effluent weir |
| RAS Concentration | 8,000-12,000 mg/L | - | Typical thickening |
| Detention Time | 2-4 hours | - | At average flow |
| Surface Area per Tank | 200-2,000 m² | - | Practical limits |
Worked Examples
Example 1: Basic Mode - RAS Flow Calculation
Given:
- Influent flow (Q): 10,000 m³/d
- Target MLSS: 3,000 mg/L
- RAS concentration: 10,000 mg/L
Calculate: Required RAS flow rate
RAS flow rate:
- $Q_{RAS} = Q \times \frac{X_{MLSS}}{X_{RAS} - X_{MLSS}}$
- $Q_{RAS} = 10,000 \times \frac{3,000}{10,000 - 3,000}$
- $Q_{RAS} = 10,000 \times \frac{3,000}{7,000} = 10,000 \times 0.429 = 4,290 \text{ m³/d}$
RAS ratio:
- $r = \frac{Q_{RAS}}{Q} = \frac{4,290}{10,000} = 0.43 = 43%$
Solution:
- RAS flow rate: 4,290 m³/d
- RAS ratio: 43% or 0.43 Q
Example 2: Advanced Mode - Solids Loading Rate Check
Given:
- Flow (Q): 15,000 m³/d
- RAS flow: 7,500 m³/d (50% of Q)
- MLSS: 3,500 mg/L
- Clarifier diameter: 35 m
- Peak flow: 30,000 m³/d
Calculate: Average and peak solids loading rates
Surface area:
- $A = \frac{\pi D^2}{4} = \frac{\pi \times 35^2}{4} = \frac{3.14159 \times 1,225}{4} = 962 \text{ m²}$
Average solids loading rate:
- $\text{SLR}{avg} = \frac{(Q + Q) \times X_{MLSS}}{A \times 24}$
- $\text{SLR}_{avg} = \frac{(15,000 + 7,500) \times 3.5}{962 \times 24}$
- $\text{SLR}_{avg} = \frac{22,500 \times 3.5}{23,088} = \frac{78,750}{23,088} = 3.41 \text{ kg/m²·h}$
- Or: $\text{SLR}_{avg} = 3.41 \times 24 = 82 \text{ kg/m²·d}$
Peak solids loading rate (assuming same RAS ratio):
- $Q_{RAS,peak} = 30,000 \times 0.5 = 15,000 \text{ m³/d}$
- $\text{SLR}_{peak} = \frac{(30,000 + 15,000) \times 3.5}{962 \times 24}$
- $\text{SLR}_{peak} = \frac{157,500}{23,088} = 6.82 \text{ kg/m²·h} = 164 \text{ kg/m²·d}$
Surface overflow rate (average, based on Q + RAS):
- $\text{SOR} = \frac{Q + Q_{RAS}}{A} = \frac{22,500}{962} = 23.4 \text{ m³/m²·d}$
Solution:
- Average SLR: 82 kg/m²·d (within typical range of 100-150, on lower side)
- Peak SLR: 164 kg/m²·d (within peak range of 200-250)
- Average SOR: 23.4 m³/m²·d (good, well below 32)
Example 3: State Point Analysis - Limiting Flux
Given:
- Flow: 10,000 m³/d = 417 m³/h
- Clarifier area: 500 m²
- MLSS: 4,000 mg/L = 4.0 kg/m³
- RAS concentration target: 12,000 mg/L = 12.0 kg/m³
- Vesilind parameters: v₀ = 8 m/h, k = 0.45 m³/kg
- RAS ratio: 50% (Q_RAS = 208 m³/h)
Calculate: Limiting solids flux and verify clarifier capacity
Settling velocity at feed concentration (X = 4.0 kg/m³):
- $v_s(4.0) = 8 \times e^{-0.45 \times 4.0} = 8 \times e^{-1.8} = 8 \times 0.1653 = 1.32 \text{ m/h}$
Overflow hydraulic velocity:
- $v_{overflow} = \frac{Q}{A} = \frac{417}{500} = 0.83 \text{ m/h}$
Overflow solids flux:
- $G_{overflow} = v_s(X_f) \times X_f + v_{overflow} \times X_f$
- $G_{overflow} = 1.32 \times 4.0 + 0.83 \times 4.0 = 5.28 + 3.32 = 8.60 \text{ kg/m²·h}$
Settling velocity at underflow concentration (X = 12.0 kg/m³):
- $v_s(12.0) = 8 \times e^{-0.45 \times 12.0} = 8 \times e^{-5.4} = 8 \times 0.00450 = 0.036 \text{ m/h}$
Underflow hydraulic velocity:
- $v_{underflow} = \frac{Q_{RAS}}{A} = \frac{208}{500} = 0.42 \text{ m/h}$
Underflow solids flux:
- $G_{underflow} = v_s(X_u) \times X_u - v_{underflow} \times X_u$
- $G_{underflow} = 0.036 \times 12.0 - 0.42 \times 12.0 = 0.43 - 5.04 = -4.61 \text{ kg/m²·h}$
Note: Negative underflow flux indicates the RAS pumping rate exceeds gravity settling capacity at this concentration.
- Applied solids loading:
- $\text{Applied load} = \frac{(Q + Q_{RAS}) \times X}{A} = \frac{(417 + 208) \times 4.0}{500} = \frac{2,500}{500} = 5.0 \text{ kg/m²·h}$
Solution:
- Applied solids load: 5.0 kg/m²·h (120 kg/m²·d)
- Limiting flux: Analysis shows the clarifier can handle the overflow flux of 8.60 kg/m²·h
- The underflow flux calculation indicates the target RAS concentration of 12,000 mg/L may not be achievable at this RAS ratio
- Recommendation: Reduce RAS ratio or accept lower RAS concentration (~8,000-10,000 mg/L)
Assumptions and Limitations
- Assumes ideal settling conditions without short-circuiting or density currents
- Does not account for denitrification causing rising sludge
- Vesilind and Takács models are empirical and require site-specific calibration
- Temperature effects on settling are not explicitly included
- Does not model time-varying or dynamic conditions
- Assumes uniform sludge characteristics (SVI, settling velocity)
- Neglects wind effects and surface disturbances
- Basic mode uses typical values that may not apply to all activated sludge systems
- Does not account for filamentous bulking or pin floc conditions
- RAS concentration depends on clarifier geometry, scraper design, and withdrawal location
Troubleshooting
| Issue | Possible Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| High effluent TSS | Hydraulic overload, poor settling | Reduce SOR/SLR, increase RAS, check SVI |
| Rising sludge | Denitrification in blanket | Increase RAS rate, reduce aeration basin DO |
| Thin RAS | Low sludge blanket, high RAS rate | Reduce RAS flow, increase blanket depth |
| Thick sludge blanket | Insufficient RAS pumping | Increase RAS rate, check scrapers |
| Septic conditions | Long detention, warm weather | Increase RAS, reduce sludge age in clarifier |
| Pin floc carryover | Young sludge, high F/M | Increase SRT, reduce F/M in aeration |
| Filamentous bulking | Low F/M, nutrient deficiency | Address in aeration basin, check SVI |
| Uneven flow distribution | Inlet baffle damage | Inspect and repair inlet structure |
| Poor sludge collection | Scraper malfunction | Check mechanical equipment |
Related Process Units
- Activated Sludge - Upstream biological treatment
- Primary Clarifier - Similar settling principles
- Gravity Thickener - Similar thickening function
- MBR - Membrane alternative to secondary clarification
- DAF - Alternative clarification technology
References
- Metcalf & Eddy (2014). Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery, 5th Edition, McGraw-Hill.
- Dick, R.I. and Ewing, B.B. (1967). "The Rheology of Activated Sludge," Journal WPCF, 39(4):543-560.
- Vesilind, P.A. (1968). "Design of Prototype Thickeners from Batch Settling Tests," Water and Sewage Works, 115(7):302-307.
- Takács, I., Patry, G.G., and Nolasco, D. (1991). "A Dynamic Model of the Clarification-Thickening Process," Water Research, 25(10):1263-1271.
- Ekama, G.A., Barnard, J.L., Günthert, F.W., Krebs, P., McCorquodale, J.A., Parker, D.S., and Wahlberg, E.J. (1997). "Secondary Settling Tanks: Theory, Modelling, Design and Operation," IAWQ STR No. 6, IWA Publishing.
- WEF (2005). Clarifier Design, 2nd Edition, Water Environment Federation.
- Daigger, G.T. (1995). "Development of Refined Clarifier Operating Diagrams Using an Updated Settling Characteristics Database," Water Environment Research, 67(1):95-100.
Model Implementation
TypeScript Model Location: backend/models/processes/SecondaryClarifier.ts
Key Methods:
calculateBasic()- Simple RAS flow calculationcalculateAdvanced()- Solids flux analysis with Vesilind/Takács modelscalculateSLR()- Solids loading ratecalculateStatePoint()- Limiting flux determinationvalidate()- Parameter range validation
Change Log
| Date | Version | Changes |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-30 | 1.0 | Initial documentation with solids flux theory and state point analysis |