Appearance
Gravity Thickener
Circular settling tank using gravity sedimentation and vertical picket rakes to concentrate sludge from 2-4% to 4-8% dry solids.
Overview
Gravity thickeners are the most economical method for thickening primary sludge and low-MCRT waste activated sludge (WAS). They operate on the principle of zone settling and compression, concentrating solids by allowing particles to settle while slowly raking settled sludge to a central underflow.
When to Use
- Primary sludge thickening (highly effective, 6-8% DS achievable)
- WAS from low F/M systems (MCRT <8 days)
- Combined primary + WAS (blended feed)
- Small to medium plants where footprint allows
- When polymer-free thickening is desired
Key Characteristics
- Simple, reliable operation
- Low operating cost (no polymer)
- Good for primary sludge (4-8% DS achievable)
- Poor for extended aeration WAS (2-3% DS only)
- Large footprint requirement
- Potential for septicity and odor
Operating Modes
Basic Mode
- Fixed solids flux rate based on sludge type
- Simple overflow rate criterion
- Default underflow concentration targets
Advanced Mode
- State point analysis using Kynch theory
- Dynamic flux curve based on SVI and sludge characteristics
- Compression zone modeling
- Real-time blanket level monitoring
- Optimized picket speed control
Mathematical Model
Governing Equation - Solids Flux Theory
The limiting solids flux determines thickener area:
$$G_L = V_s(X) \times X + V_u \times X$$
Where:
- $G_L$ = limiting solids flux (kg/m²·d)
- $V_s(X)$ = settling velocity as function of concentration (m/h)
- $X$ = solids concentration (kg/m³)
- $V_u$ = underflow velocity (m/h)
Vesilind Settling Velocity
$$V_s = V_0 \times e^{-kX}$$
Where:
- $V_0$ = maximum settling velocity (m/h), typically 5-15 m/h
- $k$ = settleability constant (m³/kg), related to SVI
- $X$ = solids concentration (kg/m³)
Relationship to SVI: $$k = \frac{0.35}{SVI}$$
Where SVI = Sludge Volume Index (mL/g)
State Point Analysis
The state point $(X_f, G_f)$ is where feed concentration meets the required flux:
$$A_{required} = \frac{Q \times X_f}{G_L}$$
Where:
- $A_{required}$ = thickener surface area (m²)
- $Q$ = feed flow rate (m³/d)
- $X_f$ = feed solids concentration (kg/m³)
Underflow Concentration
For a given underflow rate $Q_u$:
$$X_u = \frac{Q \times X_f}{Q_u}$$
Practical maximum $X_u$:
- Primary sludge: 60-80 kg/m³ (6-8% DS)
- Low MCRT WAS: 40-50 kg/m³ (4-5% DS)
- Extended aeration WAS: 20-30 kg/m³ (2-3% DS)
Solids Loading Rate
$$SLR = \frac{Q \times TSS_{in}}{A}$$
Where:
- $SLR$ = solids loading rate (kg/m²·d)
- Typical range: 30-60 kg/m²·d for primary, 15-30 kg/m²·d for WAS
Surface Overflow Rate
$$SOR = \frac{Q}{A}$$
Typical range: 15-30 m³/m²·d (low for WAS, high for primary)
Design Parameters
Input Parameters
| Parameter | Symbol | Unit | Range | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sludge type | - | - | Primary/WAS/Mixed | Primary | Feed sludge characteristics |
| Feed concentration | $X_f$ | % DS | 0.5-4 | 2.0 | Inlet solids concentration |
| Target underflow | $X_u$ | % DS | 3-8 | 5.0 | Desired thickened concentration |
| SVI | - | mL/g | 50-250 | 120 | Sludge volume index |
| Solids flux limit | $G_L$ | kg/m²·d | 20-80 | 40 | Design limiting flux |
| Picket speed | $\omega$ | rpm | 0.01-0.05 | 0.02 | Rake rotation speed |
| Sidewater depth | $H$ | m | 2.5-4.5 | 3.5 | Tank depth |
Output Parameters
| Parameter | Unit | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Required area | m² | Surface area for design flux |
| Tank diameter | m | Circular tank diameter |
| Underflow rate | m³/d | Thickened sludge withdrawal |
| Overflow rate | m³/d | Clarified liquid (return to plant) |
| Solids capture | % | Percentage of solids in underflow |
| Blanket depth | m | Settled sludge layer depth |
| Picket torque | kW | Rake drive power requirement |
Configuration Guide
Step-by-Step Setup
Characterize Feed Sludge
- Measure SVI (settling test)
- Determine solids concentration
- Identify sludge type (primary, WAS, mixed)
- Calculate Vesilind parameters: $V_0$ and $k$
Determine Target Underflow Concentration
- Primary sludge: 6-8% DS
- WAS (low MCRT): 4-5% DS
- WAS (extended aeration): 2-3% DS
- Mixed: 4-6% DS
Calculate Required Area
Method 1: Solids Flux (preferred)
For primary sludge @ SVI=100: k = 0.35/100 = 0.0035 m³/kg V₀ = 10 m/h At X = 40 kg/m³: Vs = 10 × e^(-0.0035×40) = 7.4 m/h G = 7.4 × 40 = 296 kg/m²·d For Q=500 m³/d, Xf=20 kg/m³: A = (500 × 20)/296 = 33.8 m² → Use 40 m² (7.1m diameter)Method 2: Solids Loading Rate
SLR = 50 kg/m²·d (primary sludge) Solids load = 500 × 20 = 10,000 kg/d A = 10,000/50 = 200 m²Select Tank Dimensions
- Diameter: $D = \sqrt{4A/\pi}$
- Depth: 3-4m (2.5m minimum for blanket control)
- Freeboard: 0.3-0.5m
- Bottom slope: 1:12 to center (or flat bottom)
Design Picket Mechanism
- Picket arms: 2-4 per radius
- Picket height: 200-300mm
- Picket spacing: 300-600mm vertically
- Rotation: 0.01-0.05 rpm (1-3 hours per revolution)
- Torque overload protection
Configure Underflow Control
- Time-based withdrawal (intermittent or continuous)
- Blanket level sensor (ultrasonic or conductivity)
- Variable speed pumps
- Target blanket depth: 40-60% of sidewater depth
Typical Design Values
| Sludge Type | SLR (kg/m²·d) | SOR (m³/m²·d) | Underflow DS (%) | Depth (m) | Picket Speed (rpm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | 40-60 | 20-30 | 6-8 | 3.0-3.5 | 0.02-0.03 |
| Low MCRT WAS | 20-40 | 12-20 | 4-5 | 3.5-4.0 | 0.01-0.02 |
| Extended aeration WAS | 10-25 | 8-15 | 2-3 | 3.5-4.5 | 0.01-0.02 |
| Mixed (50/50) | 30-50 | 15-25 | 4-6 | 3.0-4.0 | 0.02-0.03 |
Performance Criteria
Achievable Underflow Concentrations
| Feed Sludge | SVI (mL/g) | Feed DS (%) | Underflow DS (%) | Volume Reduction (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | 50-100 | 2-4 | 6-8 | 70-85% |
| Primary | 100-150 | 2-4 | 5-7 | 65-80% |
| WAS (MCRT 5-8d) | 80-120 | 0.8-1.2 | 4-5 | 75-85% |
| WAS (MCRT 10-15d) | 120-180 | 0.6-1.0 | 3-4 | 70-80% |
| WAS (extended aer.) | 150-250 | 0.5-0.8 | 2-3 | 60-75% |
| Mixed | 80-130 | 1.5-2.5 | 4-6 | 70-80% |
Solids Capture
- Typical: 95-98%
- With good blanket control: >98%
- Poor settling sludge: 90-95%
Overflow Quality
- TSS: 100-500 mg/L (acceptable for return to head of plant)
- Higher during upset or blanket loss
- Biological sludge tends to have higher overflow TSS than primary
Troubleshooting
| Issue | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Low underflow concentration | Excessive withdrawal rate | Reduce underflow pumping, increase blanket level |
| Poor sludge settleability (high SVI) | Reduce SRT, check for bulking, add polymer | |
| Inadequate retention time | Reduce feed rate, check for hydraulic overload | |
| High overflow TSS | Hydraulic overload (high SOR) | Reduce feed, add capacity |
| Blanket loss | Increase underflow rate, check picket operation | |
| Rising sludge (septicity) | Increase underflow frequency, reduce blanket depth | |
| Picket torque alarm | Compacted blanket | Increase underflow withdrawal immediately |
| Mechanical binding | Stop, inspect, clear obstruction | |
| Grit accumulation | Drain and clean tank | |
| Odor issues | Septicity in blanket | Increase underflow frequency, reduce retention |
| Dead zones | Check picket coverage, ensure slow rotation | |
| Anaerobic conditions | Aeration not recommended (disrupts settling) | |
| Poor primary thickening | Grease/FOG coating solids | Pre-screen or skim, hot water washing |
| Lightweight particles | Add coagulant or switch to DAF | |
| Foaming | Biological activity in blanket | Increase withdrawal, spray water on surface |
| Surfactants | Defoamer addition, reduce retention |
Operation & Maintenance
Daily Checks
- Visual inspection of overflow clarity
- Monitor blanket level (ultrasonic or sludge judge)
- Verify picket rotation (2-3 hours per revolution)
- Check underflow concentration (jar test or online meter)
- Observe torque indicator
- Listen for unusual noises
Weekly Maintenance
- Clean overflow weir
- Check underflow pump operation
- Verify blanket level sensors
- Inspect feed distribution
- Review withdrawal schedule effectiveness
Monthly Tasks
- Measure SVI of feed and underflow
- Calibrate blanket level instruments
- Inspect picket mechanism (underwater camera or drain)
- Check for grit accumulation
- Review torque trends
- Verify overflow return TSS with lab test
Annual Tasks
- Drain and inspect tank interior
- Full picket inspection and repair
- Drive mechanism overhaul
- Repaint exposed surfaces
- Clean influent and effluent piping
- Review performance vs. design
Advanced Features
Dynamic Blanket Control
Level-based withdrawal: $$Q_u = K \times (h_{blanket} - h_{target})$$
Where:
- $Q_u$ = underflow rate (m³/h)
- $K$ = control gain
- $h_{blanket}$ = measured blanket level (m)
- $h_{target}$ = setpoint (typically 1.5-2.0m)
Polymer Addition (Hybrid Thickening)
Adding low-dose polymer (0.5-2 kg/tonne DS) can:
- Increase underflow concentration by 1-2%
- Improve capture rate to >98%
- Allow higher solids loading (+20-30%)
Cost-benefit: Polymer cost vs. downstream volume reduction
Temperature Effects
$$V_s(T) = V_s(20°C) \times 1.02^{(T-20)}$$
- Cold weather (5°C): 30% reduction in settling velocity
- Warm weather (25°C): 10% increase
- Design for worst case (winter conditions)
Flocculation Zone
Some designs include gentle mixing zone ahead of thickener:
- Low-intensity agitation (G = 20-50 s⁻¹)
- 10-20 minute retention
- Improves floc size and settling
- Useful for poor settling sludge
Worked Example
Given
- Primary sludge: 800 m³/d @ 3% DS
- SVI: 90 mL/g
- Target underflow: 6% DS
- Temperature: 15°C
Solution
Step 1: Calculate Vesilind parameters
k = 0.35/90 = 0.00389 m³/kg
V₀ = 12 m/h (typical for primary)Step 2: Construct flux curve
At X = 30 kg/m³: Vs = 12 × e^(-0.00389×30) = 3.68 m/h → G = 110 kg/m²·d
At X = 40 kg/m³: Vs = 12 × e^(-0.00389×40) = 2.51 m/h → G = 100 kg/m²·d
At X = 50 kg/m³: Vs = 12 × e^(-0.00389×50) = 1.71 m/h → G = 86 kg/m²·d
At X = 60 kg/m³: Vs = 12 × e^(-0.00389×60) = 1.17 m/h → G = 70 kg/m²·d (underflow target)Step 3: Determine limiting flux
Feed: Xf = 30 kg/m³
State point analysis → G_L ≈ 100 kg/m²·d (conservative)Step 4: Calculate area
A = (Q × Xf)/G_L = (800 × 30)/100 = 240 m²
D = √(4×240/π) = 17.5m → Use 18m diameter (254 m²)Step 5: Verify SLR and SOR
SLR = (800 × 30)/254 = 94.5 kg/m²·d ✗ Too high!
Revise to D = 20m (314 m²)
SLR = 76.4 kg/m²·d ✓ (within 40-60 range, borderline)
SOR = 800/314 = 2.55 m/d ✓Step 6: Underflow rate
Solids balance: 800 × 30 = Qu × 60
Qu = 400 m³/d
Volume reduction = (800-400)/800 = 50%Step 7: Picket design
Depth: 3.5m
Picket speed: 0.02 rpm
Torque (empirical): 0.5 kW for 20m diameterRelated Units
- DAF-Thickener - Alternative for high-SVI WAS
- Rotary-Drum-Thickener - Alternative mechanical thickening
- Gravity-Belt-Thickener - Alternative for WAS
- Anaerobic-Digester - Downstream stabilization
- Belt-Press - Downstream dewatering
References
- WEF (2018). Design of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants, MOP 8, 6th Ed., Ch. 17.
- Metcalf & Eddy (2014). Wastewater Engineering, 5th Ed., pp. 1589-1610.
- Dick, R.I. (1970). "Role of Activated Sludge Final Settling Tanks." J. San. Eng. Div., ASCE.
- Vesilind, P.A. (1968). "Design of Prototype Thickeners from Batch Settling Tests." Water & Sewage Works.
- Ekama, G.A. et al. (1997). "Secondary Settling Tanks: Theory, Design and Operation." Water Research.
- CIWEM (2013). Sewage Sludge Treatment and Disposal, Manual of Practice.